
Standardisation of buildings will drive down procurement costs says Budget Plan for Growth
The government will cut 20% from the cost of construction projects by standardising buildings, and give the industry greater foresight of public work.
In its ‘Plan for Growth’, released alongside the Budget on Wednesday, it said it would introduce “new models of procurement” and cut out bespoke design in the public sector.
The Coalition has been putting pressure on suppliers to reduce costs since it won power, and chief construction adviser Paul Morrell has told the government the industry can cut prices by up to 30% if it works in a more integrated way.
Yet this is the first time the government has put a figure on how much it wants construction to cut costs by, and explicitly linked savings to standardisation.
Responding to contractors’ demands for greater clarity over capital spending, it also said it would publish the public sector pipeline from autumn 2011.
“[We will] enable building contractors to respond more effectively to emerging market opportunities by publishing quarterly from autumn 2011, a rolling two year forward programme of infrastructure and construction projects where public funding has been agreed,” the plan said.
Stephen Ratcliffe, director of the UK contractors’ group, said that the pipeline announcement would give the industry more certainty and stability.
“We’re quite pleased with that, it’s good news. It was our number one priority,” he said.
23 March 2011
23 March 2011
23 March 2011
23 March 2011
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (4)
I think we may some old Clasp system drawings in the attic.
Good, lets get rid of the costs from these droves of architects that are living out their dreams at the expense of the general public.
Maybe I'm getting old but I've worked in the industry for nearly 15 years and this has been a consistent theme. Not the sentiment that we can do better, I'm comfortable with that, but the rhetoric from Government. The headline "cutting costs by 20%" is misleading. Many of the largest Government clients have made great strides in delivering better value for money over the years. So how on earth do they intend to deliver on this is what I want to know? We can all talk the talk, but can they walk the walk? Time will tell
unless buildings are built like cars, in factories mass produced, we shall never reach those targets. There is no difference in building a bespoke car or a building, both unnecessarily expensive, not practical and from Adam Smith era !!
Hal-Luke Savas MBA FCIM MBIFM ICIOB affCIBSE
london@tekomekhtn.eu