Independent Panel on Foresty back councils’ use of planning law to drive increase in timber buildings
A government-commissioned report has backed controversial proposals that councils adopt a ‘wood first’ planning policy for construction projects.
In May, Hackney council became the first local authority to propose introducing a ‘wood first’ planning policy, which would favour timber buildings being built in the borough.
But trade body Modern Masonry Alliance and development organisation the Concrete Centre denounced the move as ill-considered and a leading construction lawyer has said such criteria would be open to legal challenge.
But the report by the Independent Panel on Forestry, commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said: “Local Authorities should use their Local Plans to introduce a ‘wood first’ policy for construction projects to increase use of wood in buildings.”
It said the move was important to green the supply chain and promote greater use of wood across industries.
David Hopkins, chief executive of campaign group Wood for Good, said: “Greater demand for timber products from the nation’s construction sector will see more forest planted and in turn, a greater amount of CO2 absorbed from the atmosphere.
He added: “Just a four per cent increase in our forest cover would absorb 10 per cent of all of the UK’s carbon emissions in a single year which can then be stored in timber products. Local authorities can use their powers to encourage more sustainable development and help Britain to reach its carbon reduction commitments in the most cost effective manner.”
Hackney council is set to decide on whether to adopt such a policy later this year.
12 July 2012
08 June 2012
25 May 2012
23 May 2012
17 May 2012
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (3)
I have concluded the green lobby is what the name suggests,lobby hard and the law will change in accordance with you wishes.
I appreciate science has been used to show how green timber framed buildings are,however the facts remain that 100 year old buildings built of brick still are still desirable places to live and will last another 100 years.
I doubt in 50 years time these timber buildings will even be standing without significant repairs being required.As a minimum they will need to be reboarded with gypsum, yes the material which gives of hydrogen sulphide when it decomposes and costs a fortune to dispose off.
Personally I would rather live in a block / brick house and would be happy to pay a premium to do so. Surely this premium can be used to offset CO2 emissions? Surely the x 5 longevity of the structure cancels out the CO2 emissions?
Common sense has to kick in at some point.
I agree with Patrick
Lets have a poll?