
Battersea Power Station - Allies and Morrison
Architect Allies & Morrison offers ‘practical’ proposals for London landmark
New plans for Battersea Power Station would see the iconic building turned into a large-scale performance arena with housing built on surrounding land.
Architect Allies & Morrison has become the latest architect to put together plans for the building, following the collapse of the Irish-backed Rafael Vinoly scheme in November.
The Vinoly plan originally included a 300m high “eco-dome” that was later ditched. Previous proposals for the site included a theme park and a huge shopping complex.
Property group Knight Frank is now handling the site’s sale for administrator Ernst & Young and is hoping to raise up to £500 million for creditors.
Allies & Morrison’s plans were drawn up after it was conacted by Save Britain’s Heritage president Marcus Binney.
Its scheme involves turning the building’s Boiler House into an 11,000-seat arena able to host concerts and events while the neighbouring Turbine Halls would be used to host exhibitions, receptions and launches.
The former coal bunker area and Grade II listed Water Pumping Station would be kept and housing would be built on surrounding land.
Morrison said the Boiler House could be quickly used in a “raw state” as an open air venue with a roof, raised floor and hospitality boxes added in later stages.
It said its scheme was “a very practical idea not romantic nor financially so ambitious”.
The plans will be unveiled at event at the Building Centre in London organised by heritage group the Twentieth Century Society.
A version of this story first appeared on Building’s sister title Building Design. Read it here.
7 June 2012
24 February 2012
17 February 2012
15 February 2012
21 December 2011
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (1)
It is interesting the view we have on heritage.
If this was a green field site and some one applied for planning permission today to construct a power station of the same scale and size as Battersea it would be rejected and no doubt planners would refer to the negative affect a building of such scale would have on the London skyline as well as lots of other matters.
Yet, when this building is proposed for demolition, despite its legacy industrial heritage and the contamination and pollution it was responsible for, the heritage lobby wish to retain it. This argument makes no sense whatsoever.
If you think sustainability, as this is one of the last two major sites in London, the site should be used as efficiently as it can be to provide the desperately need housing and other facilities this area needs.
It it means demolition, so be it. At least the bricks can be reused to construct many of the buildings that would be built on the site and aspects of the architectural style and heritage could be used in a new scheme.
The easy decision is to retain the structure, however this seems to be to be the wrong decision for a site of such size and location as this one.